(04-30-2015, 03:28 PM)Nanny Wrote: We don't know for sure what type of "false flag" event is likely this year during this Jade Helm, but we know for sure it will usher immediate Martial Law into our lives.

Have you seen the AARP TV commercial dated 2015, yet? I've got to grab hubby's headphones, and listen again, as I can already hear the words "martial law, calm and president" just as claimed.

PSYOPS without question....you'll see and hear. Being pretty immune to the nuttiness of the age we live in, and not putting hardly anything past "Them," still I'm shocked at the audacity this org. and those they're serving, have.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VdPyusbbCA

Eagle1, this song's, err article link is for you.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/05/03/us-army-special-operations-officer-to-reveal-that-isis-is-controlled-by-the-cia/

Yes! thank you for directing to the June botruns. headed to peruse them a bit. (Can't wait to get confirmation if the freaks in Garland, Texas are Isis or not. Well, hope we get the truth of it.

Uh, I swear that I'm awake right now but not posting like it. You said "June!" Botruns go back to September. Ahem.....wake me when the war's over, okay?

(05-03-2015, 09:06 PM)Eagle1 Wrote: Shocker about CIA controlling ISIS, eh? Where ja here it first? Mr. Dreambot is who caught this way back in Jun 2014! Good to see real world confirmation.

(05-04-2015, 09:32 AM)Eagle1 Wrote: Yes indeed. Back in June, we were doing 2 bot runs about once a week. One bot run was for Project August (just on the PA dreams) and the other bot run was originally called "Dream Forecast" and I actually ran I think 3 different types of dream bot dictionaries on all the collective dreams. Those were published back in the blog side. It would be hard to research those bot runs because I wasn't publishing them in an orderly fashion like I'm doing now nor was I taking snapshots of the results (or at least on the majority of them). We were really at a slow crawl back then, trying to figure this thing out.

***August*** This is so preliminary but it needs to be put here. I used a search engine and found this blog entry by Eagle1 that I had never read. (dang, do I need to go back and back.....to read a ton of his/your gems, Yes!)

I am not even finished reading this, and will reread it because "August" is a big deal in this. So, nothing huge happened last August and here we are with August in the middle of Jade Helm! So, this got me really on the edge of my seat, so-to-speak.

This is dated June of last year. It's about a very big, long dream Eagle1 had just made public, from Elyse, WOW...

I don't even know yet...."Is it koo or Coup?!"

http://nationaldreamcenter.com/wp/2014/06/koo-volume-2-amazing-dream-is-now-public/

(05-06-2015, 11:21 AM)Eagle1 Wrote: Wonderful questions, AD. I love the way that mind of yours works!

Okay, as I'm generating a chock full presentation for the IASD conference in June, I am reminded about some very significant data points we collected in Project August.

First axiom: The incubation process pushes the typical short-term precognition window towards the intended incubation time window. So, for example, historically, if you were to put NO TIME PERIOD in your intention, you would have the biggest chance of it coming true at about 7 days. However, if you were to start in April and intend for August, your average time to manifestation would be 50 days. That is an incredible difference!

Here's something else, though. Axiom 2: The longer the dream takes to come true, the less accurate it will be. In other words, the less the dream will resemble the future event, the further out you project. So, if you intend for a precognitive dream for next week, that dream will be more accurate than your incubated dream for a time period of next year. 

Realize a couple of more tidbits:
- These rules were developed based on collective incubations, not individual dreams. This is important because each dreamer has their own set of talents and special gifts. I can't possibly know each individual probability of you, as an individual, getting an accurate precognitive dream. That wasn't part of the test.

- All the data supporting these rules is considered SUBTLE. The correlation (p) for the accuracy rule was .46. This means that there is definitely a correlation, but it's not super strong. A strong correlation would be something like .7 or .8. BUT, there is definitely a correlation there, albeit subtle.


Okay, so extrapolating those findings to Elyse's individual dream, basically, the longer it takes for her dream to manifest, the more unlike the dram it will be. However, in this case, Elyse's dream wasn't particualrly overly dramatic and crystal clear about the actual events. All that Koo said, ultimately, was that life is about to change in a big way. Therefore, I'm not overly concerned about a loss in preciseness in this case because the dream wasn't too precise to begin with. It still leaves a lot of P2 Creative force for us, too. That is, Life can change in a really good way or in a disasterous way. We actually have a large say in which direction that will end up being. And to be honest, I don't really care which way it is. I just would like to see some major changes because ultimately, the status quo is precisely what gives the string pullers their power. We need to break the collective out it's insatiable and deep state of hypnosis. Then and only then can glorious things happen. Then and only then will the power return to us both collectively AND individually.