We’ve got a backup on headlines recently that stand a chance to fulfill earlier linguistics…<\/p>\n
Linguistics on 9 June: \u201cDifferent life sure felt weird\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n I believe we are getting a little tickle on this one. Let\u2019s start with the symptoms and then progress to the possible cause. Perhaps this is \u201cnormal,\u201d but for some reason this year\u2019s weather does seem to be a bit off. For starters, there\u2019s no snow where there normally is this time year<\/a>, but then there IS snow where there typically isn\u2019t<\/a> (I mean we\u2019re almost getting into the July for crying out loud.) Has the weather been weird in your part of the world?<\/p>\n How about some causes. Well, in today\u2019s world, never rule out mainmade causes first. I\u2019m not your typical environmentalist, but I do know that Congress has been approving climate engineering for decades. I also know that that HAARP patterns have been changing the typical jet streams, especially this past spring to where cold arctic air actually funneled into areas it typically does not.<\/p>\n But even with all the weather modification, there are still bigtime uncontrollable factors also, such as the weakening magnetic field<\/a>. Robert Felix\u2019s research shows that our poles reverse consistently on a historical basis. The articles I\u2019m presenting try to argue that poles take a 1000 years to reverse. Felix emphasizes that is true SOME of the time, but not always. He and others have postulated that there are several periods in Earth\u2019s history where the poles have actually swung instantaneously, providing a horrific and nasty place to live here on Earth.<\/p>\n When the poles shift quickly, the magnetosphere weakens, and the faster the poles switch, the thinner the atmosphere. Well, even mainstream news is watching the poles shift, as indicated by these articles<\/a>. Hold on to your horses everybody, because the word \u2018weird\u2019 might be a fabulous word to describe the new life\u2026once the poles switch.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Linguistics on 9 June: \u201cParty says play June mostly pain\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n With just about a week left in June, it wouldn\u2019t seem that there has been that much pain at a collective level (as least so far). However, perhaps this linguistics phrase was simply predicting the headlines in June. Nine days after this DreamForecast, we already have three headlines associated with pain:<\/p>\n Canada gas prices<\/a> = pain<\/p>\n