1,200 lives lost in an outbreak, but location dead wrong

[NADW-P1]

Some times I get impressions of a place, like Flooding and I lost my husband. In my dream I was in a place that I knew was Italy, I just didn't know where in Italy, so I went on Google maps and found a place from the photos that looked like the scene from my dreams. Since I put in an exactly place I don't believe it is fair to call that precognitive, so I never reported it as such. Even though I found a flood in Italy and the town looked like the town from my dream.

In the news articles about the flood, they called it "Northern Italy" It happened to be three towns below what I predicted.

Sometimes I also get impressions of a place. If the company who was making the vaccine has their labs in Montana and she got the news from the energy of the people in the lab, that may have caused her to believe it was some place else.

Hard to decide, but we are going for accuracy, and if accuracy stands correct with the new scoring, then 5 for the What, 5 for When, but zero for Where. It is my impression that the scores are based upon a standard, which is why I thought it was generous when you gave me a higher score for broken windows, that score was based on something symbolic, which I agree to the comment that there was no other way to describe it. The scoring does give room for "Symbolic" hits. The question here really falls back to you Chris, is this scoring system something that will be used in the future for say example: You need someone to dream for you for a precognitive result. You need to know where but not the what, can you use the scoring system to pull out a dream for your request to find out a where, rather then a what?

If that is your intention for the future of the scoring I would say be as accurate as possible. Otherwise to me the scoring that I get I am keeping track of which personally allows me to know what area's I am good at, and what areas I need to practice getting like the When.