07-25-2016, 11:42 AM
No. There's no need to apologize, UCM. Even if someone had collated previous Taylor runs, different eyes will see different aspects. It's in the process of bouncing different aspects off each other and listening to our guts that we can ferret out any sort of potential event.
It's also necessary to get fresh eyes because it's too easy to become familiar with how the group works and thinks. That familiarity could lead to "bot ruts" and missing something crucial.
As it is, you've offered some new insight into a word we've been noodling around for months without any/much success. That is an invaluable contribution so don't sell yourself short. Jump in, bounce ideas around, and see what resonates. We need all the help we can get.
It's also necessary to get fresh eyes because it's too easy to become familiar with how the group works and thinks. That familiarity could lead to "bot ruts" and missing something crucial.
As it is, you've offered some new insight into a word we've been noodling around for months without any/much success. That is an invaluable contribution so don't sell yourself short. Jump in, bounce ideas around, and see what resonates. We need all the help we can get.