Chat
02-20-2015, 07:39 PM
Good point! As I read the link about it I, too wondered how many folks will be devastated because of a false-positive and then forced into 21 days isolation for "monitoring." The article clearly said it's not as good as the test. I found it peculiar that they didn't try to quantify how much worse than that other test, it is.
We have a law that says if we as much as sniffle...so it sounds like...we can be detained in an outbreak. This is a very new law, dangme can't recall what they call it. Surely it isn't in the NDAA...but then again, they are famous for attaching things that have no relevance to any certain law when it's being written.
We have a law that says if we as much as sniffle...so it sounds like...we can be detained in an outbreak. This is a very new law, dangme can't recall what they call it. Surely it isn't in the NDAA...but then again, they are famous for attaching things that have no relevance to any certain law when it's being written.
(02-20-2015, 06:27 PM)Eagle1 Wrote: For some reason, nowhere can I find the false positive rating on this new ebola machine. That's something I'm particularly interested in because I can see how the new technology could be used for profit, eugenics, or just mere control. Anyway, the cancer industry is a great example of how a false positive could completely wreck a person's life. Who built this thing, was their heart in the right place, and what's the false positive rate on this thing?
Nonetheless, great update TwiceBlessed!