Chat
05-08-2015, 03:38 PM
Anyone want to recant their opinion that the Garland incident was real?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hero...41518.html
It's one thing to want to remain anonymous in fear of retaliation; it's quite another thing that no one apparently knows who it was that shot the alleged terrorists. In other words, they aren't protecting his name....they just don't even know it!
In my book, that's pretty strong evidence in favor of the opinion that Garland was a hoax. Of course, it's not proof, but my suspicions increase because of this article.
How do you hide several gunshots in a place where hundreds if not thousands of people are? Highly unlikely IMO
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hero...41518.html
It's one thing to want to remain anonymous in fear of retaliation; it's quite another thing that no one apparently knows who it was that shot the alleged terrorists. In other words, they aren't protecting his name....they just don't even know it!
In my book, that's pretty strong evidence in favor of the opinion that Garland was a hoax. Of course, it's not proof, but my suspicions increase because of this article.
How do you hide several gunshots in a place where hundreds if not thousands of people are? Highly unlikely IMO