Chat
05-16-2015, 01:18 PM
Twice, yes, I'm interested in knowing more about the liar. Please do send more material my way.
At the same time, however, even if this is the devil himself, the deceit would fall flat on it's face if it was 100% untruth. Therefore, I tend to look more at the actual message and discard the facts about the messenger. If, for example, there's indication that only 1% of the message is factual, I'm really wanting to know what the 1% is. That is my point, but at the same time, I'm also willing to learn more about the messenger. I do like to separate the two concept here, though. I think that's important for multiple reasons.
At the same time, however, even if this is the devil himself, the deceit would fall flat on it's face if it was 100% untruth. Therefore, I tend to look more at the actual message and discard the facts about the messenger. If, for example, there's indication that only 1% of the message is factual, I'm really wanting to know what the 1% is. That is my point, but at the same time, I'm also willing to learn more about the messenger. I do like to separate the two concept here, though. I think that's important for multiple reasons.