These three headlines weren’t perfect hits, but they are nonetheless striking and worthy of discussion. Let’s go in order…

Bridget writes: “Headline #111 looks like you got a hit!”

Agreed.

I’m willing to bet that most people have already seen this news out of Tibet. When I first saw the news, I saw a very high DreamSeer score, because all I recalled from the prediction was a busload of people falling.

Tibet tour bus falls off highway into valley, killing 44 people

BEIJING – A tour bus on a highway in Tibet fell off a 10-meter (30-foot) cliff after crashing into an SUV and a pickup, killing 44 people and injuring 11 others, China’s state media reported Sunday.

The bus was carrying 50 people when it careened in mountainous southern Tibet on Saturday, the Xinhua News Agency said.

Most of the passengers were from four Chinese provinces. There were four people in the SUV and a truck driver, but their condition was unclear.

Police detained the managers of a travel agency and tour company connected with the bus trip, Xinhua said.

Headline #111

“[European] Bridge explodes…Bus full of people freefall into [European] River.”

What becomes obvious about this event is that we indeed dreamed the hazards of getting on a bus. However, we bit off on Europe as the location, and this Tibet disaster had nothing to do with a bridge.

But since we don’t see falling busses everyday, I do think that this alone is quite extraordinary (i.e, the falling busload of people), but the resulting DreamSeer score is nothing to write home about: 2.8

As we’ve seen in the past, the DreamSeer doesn’t necessarily indicate the dramatic connection to the prediction, as is the case here.

#112: Terrorist targets bus

‘Terrorist’ Driving Bulldozer Kills 1 in Israel Bus Attack

By Brian Ries2014-08-04 11:49:09 UTC

An attacker rammed the front end of a massive construction bulldozer into an Israeli bus on Monday, overturning the vehicle before he was shot and killed by a police officer, authorities said.

DreamSeer 4.4

Wait a second…isn’t that a perfect match? Uh….I can’t do that for a couple of reasons. First off, the location wasn’t marked, which was a direct reflection of the dream material. I don’t think anyone reading the dreams could have pinpointed this headline in Gaza.

Can U do this please?

Suggestion: While we’re on this topic, I want readers to start seeing the word TERRORIST as more of a description of the person saying the word than a description about the person doing a bad deed. For example, we aren’t taught that George Washington was a terrorist, but to the Brits he was!

Was this Palestinian bulldoze operator a terrorist? The only way to answer the question is to ask, “According to whom?” Without knowing the WHOM, the word TERRORIST is meaningless…absolutely meaningless.

The label TERRORIST is purely subjective and says more about the people uttering the word than it does describing the object of conversation! This is not to say that the accusing person is a terrorist….but it definitely describes the orientation of that person . The very word Terrorist was a word coined in order to use in mass labeling. It reduces our ability to think and analyze logically and empathically.

Therefore, the next time you see the word TERRORIST, snap out of the programming and look at who’s making the claim. Gracias.

#113: Hillary for Pres (2016)

Hillary Clinton pummels Obama foreign policy

By Frida Ghitis

updated 8:40 AM EDT, Mon August 11, 2014

(CNN) — Yes, Hillary Clinton is running for president, and she is running away from President Barack Obama’s record on foreign policy.

That’s a very clear message from the interview just published in The Atlantic in which she drew sharp distinctions between her view of America’s role in the world and those of the President, while also expressing significant disagreements with him over the right approach to ongoing crises in the Middle East.

DreamSeer 2.8

Wait a second…isn’t that a perfect match? No way, Jose. I did think that way when I saw that CNN article, but I luckily caught myself by seeing this Reuter’s snippet:

“…potential 2016 U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said…”

I thought, “Wait a second, doesn’t Reuters know that Clinton is running?” That’s when I saw the big “OPINION” word up at the top of the first article. The CNN page was an opinion that Hillary is running, which represents a mere tickle on our scoring.

The Reuter’s article is also a tickle because they both support the bigger meme…Hillary running for president.

Not a high score, but certainly nothing to ignore either.

To view more Proj Aug headlines, click here.

Sign up for free email alerts! You’ll get notifications when new Forecasts are published, big predictions have manifested, or any other important topic that might deserve your attention. Free, confidential, quit at any time.

Copyright © 2014 Chris McCleary. Except for quotes, all rights reserved and any reference about this material requires a link back to this page.