More linguistics were fulfilled yesterday from a VERY surprising admission in mainstream news. I actually can’t believe that this article was even displayed in the public consciousness stream:
“Wearing sunscreen may NOT prevent skin cancer: Study claims even SPF factor 50 creams can’t fully protect against UV rays” (link here)
This officially fulfills the earlier linguistics that came out 6 days ago:
“Sun sleeping makes death” (DreamSeer score: 4.6)
Discussion
Even though I don’t particularly like the linguistics (the phrase isn’t fully accurate as I’ll explain later), the DreamSeer score is one of the highest that our linguistics has seen because of how accurate it predicted the aforementioned article.
The article basically says that even if you spread on SPF 50, you can still die from the sun (i.e. from the deadly version of skin cancer!!
Thus, the linguistics were fully fulfilled, but there’s much more to the story.
The reason why SP50 still causes malignant melanoma is because IT BLOCKS THE SUN! You can research this one yourself, but how paradoxical can we get? Yes, in order to keep us from the almost harmless version of skin cancer, we put on something that CAUSES the deadly kind!
Heresy, you ask? Interestingly, mainstream is actually catching on, although they still refuse to admit what the alternative community has already known. Here are some links you need to check out. Keep in mind that the first one is actually a government site, and it actually admits that we need sunshine, something that not to long ago they were NEVER willing to admit!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18180454
http://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/100112p58.shtml
…and the list goes on to infinity, almost literally. The only website you’ll find that vehemently opposes sunshine on the skin is the cancer institute. Can you believe this? The people who are supposedly looking for cancer cures won’t allow you use the biggest known anti-cancer treatment…the sun? (*****)
Please do your due diligence on this issue. It does require your full attention…it could mean your life.
****** Warning: this article does not supply medical advice and should not be construed as such. If you have questions about the material herein, you are advised to seek the assistance of a licensed professional. You are fully responsible for the actions you take. Also the FDA has not approved this statement….duh. *****
Copyright (c) 2014 Chris McCleary.
I am so very thrilled you addressed this WMD, Sunscreen. For those that think I am over board, search official WMD definition and you’ll see it describes a lot more than you realize, toxins of the varied kind.
“B) any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332a
Dr. Elizabeth Plourde – sunscreen is a biohazard
http://www.faim.org/bookreviews/sunscreen-biohazard.html
I’ve read numerous articles with studies indicating as many as 90% of humanity are vit D deficient. With low D levels, people are tired for starters (long list of ailments with low levels) and most likely consuming addictive caffeine products to balance the sleepiness.
My friend’s D levels were so low (saw her doc to figure out why she was so tired – I told her to quit the caffeine :), she didn’t admit to the actual number. Her prescription was for 50,000 units a week, for a few months. I told her unless she spends regular time outside, she’ll need to regularly supplement.
I take D3, 10,000 units daily, and up it come autumn/winter, being in the northern latitude (northern countries have the highest depression/suicide rates). And why so much during the summer, chemtrails blocking the sun!
BTW, although particular foods provide D naturally, you can’t get enough, and with most at low levels (obvious people are eating) that is proof enough.