Collapse? …and more Hul |

We’re going to do something just a bit different today since I’ve been on the road this week. I’m going to post some food for the soul from our guest writer, Eric Hul, and then later in the day, I’ll hopefully get around to seeing what the DreamBot is saying.

I do know what the NON-DreamBot world is saying, and it’s looking lovely (not being cynical either). I’m just very curious as to whether our collective unconscious agrees with these assessments. Here’s what I’m talking about:

“Lindsey Williams: Catastrophic Events Expected In Monetary World – The World As We Know It Will Never Be The Same Again”

Is he right? Are we getting close to prime time, people? These sorts of predictions have become a dime-a-dozen lately, but one of these days, someone will eventually get it right. Just in case there’s any doubt, let me set the record straight.

It is mathematically impossible for this economic paradigm to go on for infinity. Ponzi schemes always end in collapse. It would be worth re-reading that in case there’s any question. You can disregard climate change and every environmental concern they’ve been feeding us and just look at purely economics. A debt-based system that feeds on fractional reserve banking and any sort of interest rate will inevitably collapse. Period.

Some people misinterpret my statements as some sort of political argument, and that is far from the truth. I’ve transcended our political paradigm because the economic world is way above politics, too.

So the only questions remaining is the method of the collapse and the timing. Some people, like Williams above, contend that our handlers will collapse the system on purpose for their ends. I have a different view….they need this system just the way it is and that’s the reason they’re trying to keep it pieced together as long as they possibly can.

WHEN this system reaches cardiac arrest, it’s not game over. That is, it’s not game for us. This is when the game suddenly turns on! When this happens it’s the beginning of our new-found freedom. It will be like a clean canvas awaiting our artwork. We shall work together or die together; the new world is right around the corner.

But how about the timing? Is Williams right? Well, he’s right about a lot of stuff, but he wasn’t correct about the March prediction (all of this “controlled demolition” business was supposed to go down in March…that obviously didn’t pan out). So, I have no idea if Williams is right on this or not, only time will tell.

Okay, let’s shift gears quite a bit and let Eric Hul discuss some really cool stuff about consciousness and mind-set. Afterward, I’ll close with some odds and ends…

Notes on Mind-set and passive attention (by Eric Hul)

Have you ever experienced a “change of mind”? How do you know that a change has taken place? If you’re like me, you may have considered that changes can only be perceived after some kind of comparison has been made, between two or more thoughts. A change of thought would therefore be like going from thinking about the sun to thinking about your own stubbornness. This constitutes a relatively simple example since the thought process here is linear and between two items – one tangible and the other intangible. But think about it – how do you KNOW a change has taken place? Logically, some form of passive awareness must be involved in order to make the distinction between the 2 items – apparently AFTER the thoughts have taken place. Therefore, when you think BACK to the 2 thoughts, you recognize them as different, and so, a CHANGE has taken place somewhere along the way. So what happens when the thoughts occur simultaneously? Do changes require “time”? If not, then what does that say about linear growth? Just a few things to think about…

In the mind, there are several branches of awareness that exist outside of time. To most people, this is referred to as the unconscious – an umbrella term for the limin, subconscious, superconscious, Higher self, True self and many other things that are labelled, yet poorly understood. For the purposes of this discussion however, it is only important to note that there are other forms of consciousness in our mind operating outside of our waking awareness.

So, what exactly is a mind-set? If you can imagine a mind-set as a large bowl of Jell-O (a semi-solid) that is in the process of “setting”, then we can hypothesize that it is simply a mental environment in which thoughts can settle. Logically, the only thoughts than can do so are ones that are supported by that environment. If, for example, the Jell-O is still in the early stages of setting, then a coin placed into the bowl would simply sink to the bottom. A single blade of grass however, would likely remain floating on the top. By changing the density of the semi-solid by altering its composition or simply by giving it some time, we can affect how our thoughts are supported.

Now, consider for a moment, that we are, in essence, two separate entities operating a single physical body – a conscious and unconscious division of the mind. Both are absolutely necessary in our daily lives, yet we almost exclusively refer to our actions as occurring at the conscious level. Attention, therefore, is often defined as an active process of dealing with something, or someone. But who, or what is doing the “acting?” A conscious intention (or direction), leads to a conscious thought, which leads to a conscious action. A lack thereof would usually be defined as “inaction” or being “passive”. But can the unconscious ever be inactive or passive? Can we afford not to have aspects of our unconscious controlling our circulation, respiration and millions of other bodily functions?

So what exactly IS passive attention? Simply put, it is an unconscious mind-set, resulting from a conscious intention to relinquish attention to the unconscious mind, which stands continuously at the ready. Just as if you were to set up a video camera to watch you while you sleep, or program a home alarm to notify you when there is an intruder. Your conscious mind remains passive while big brother (the unconscious) is at the watch. This way, you can ensure that your conscious mind (what most people refer to as themselves) will not get in your own way.

If you have ever performed a remote viewing session, then it is likely that you understand the pitfalls of analytic overlay, or AOL. This is a clear example of the conscious mind readily jumping to conclusions with only fragments of a larger picture like an invasive game of “Pictionary.” Although this human characteristic has undoubtedly proven most useful in the evolutionary history of our species, we have become far too dependent on it lately, and for the most part, ignored its serious cultural flaws. Have you ever heard of first impressions? Yeah.

So what is passive determination? It is simply a determined unconscious mind-set, unfettered by the banes of the conscious mind. “Sleep little one and let daddy take care of the monsters.”

Odds and Ends…

Thanks everyone for telling your friends about our new DreamScapes. This new area of the website is really for all of you. It’s intended to be more of a small community where we bat around various ideas and dreams, and ask lots of meaningful questions. If you’re a dreaming prodigy, please help out in the Open Mic DreamScape and throw in your answers to the questions and comments that people have.

Also, please keep your patience with the DreamBase, I just spent a few hours today discussing our new DreamBase design with a big-brained database expert. Too bad I didn’t have any money to give here (and just have her do it for me!) At any rate, the ideas are flowing, and so all that is required now is a lot of time. All I ask is that you keep hanging in there with our current database. Thanks everyone for all your understanding and support….we’ll get there eventually. You are all are AWESOME!!

---------- NDC Announcments -----------

Don’t miss our daily DreamBot run which shows a brief status of the collective unconscious.

Collapse? …and more Hul

Notes on Mind-set and passive attention (by Eric Hul)

Odds and Ends…

Comments

Collapse? …and more Hul — 2 Comments